What the Church Needs to Know

Every so often a study comes out and inspires one to think “Why hasn’t this been done before now?”. Recently, Mary Rice Hasson, J.D. along with Michele M. Hill, have published their preliminary report “What Catholic Women Think about Faith, Conscience, and Contraception”, in which they seek the answers to questions which many have assumed to be simpler than they are.

Hasson and Hill sought to find out:

  • What it is that *Catholic women  know about actual Church teaching on contraception.
  • How many of those women would accept or reject  those teachings once they were accurately presented.
  • Why Catholic women reject Church teaching on these issues.
  • For those who reject Church teaching, would they be willing to learn more about those teachings and if so, how.

824 women ages 18-54 voluntarily answered an online survey conducted by the polling company, inc./WomanTrend, Washington, D.C. The answers these women gave indicate that the issue at hand, whether Catholic women accept Church teaching on contraception or not, is more complex and nuanced than one might suppose. It’s easy to think that Catholic women fall into two categories – those who accept the Church’s teachings and those who do not. Hasson and Hill’s findings suggest that this is not the case.

“Instead, three groups emerge: “the faithful” (who fully accept the Church’s teaching), “the dissenters” (who completely reject the Church’s teaching), and the “soft middle” (who accept “parts” but “not all” of the teaching). ” (Hasson, 2)

It should not be surprising that the survey found a correlation between frequent sacramental practice and a higher likelihood of accepting Church teaching. What is important to note though is that of the 824 women surveyed, 72% of those women indicated that the weekly homily was the main source of their knowledge about Church teaching, yet 1/3 of women cannot accurately identify Church teaching on contraception and of that 1/3, half attend Mass at least once a week. Surprisingly and hearteningly, it is the 18-34 year old crowd (both frequent church-goers and infrequent) who are “more likely to have an accurate understanding of Church teaching”. (14) Overall, only 13% of Catholic women completely accept the Church’s teachings on contraception and 6% are unsure if they accept or reject the teachings.

Those women who reject (either wholly or in part) the Church’s teachings on contraception were asked to identify their reasons. Those reasons highlight a “broad confusion about the relationship between authoritative Catholic teaching, conscience formation, and moral autonomy.” (16) The other top two reasons were that couples have the right to enjoy sexual pleasure without worrying about pregnancy and the sad misperception that NFP (natural family planning) does not work.

The good news is that 44% of Catholic women are in what the researchers call “the soft middle”, meaning that they do not completely accept or reject Church teaching on contraception. Why is this a good thing? Because of that 44%, 39% indicate an interest in learning more about Church teaching and only 18% say that they do not accept all of the Church’s teaching on contraception because they do not accept the Church’s moral authority on contraception. This shows that Catholic women are receptive to Church teachings if they are presented clearly and accurately.

How would these women like to learn more? They are happy to tell you. 23% would like to hear couple testimonies about health and relationship benefits of NFP, another 23% want to see studies regarding NFP’s effectiveness and 22% would like to see a doctor’s recommendation of NFP and its effectiveness. Overall women were able to choose from 9 specific ways they would like to learn more about Church teaching on contraception. They could also indicate that they were not interested in learning more about Church teaching (56% chose this option).

I would like to have that 56% broken down a bit more – are they the ones that completely reject church teaching and simply refuse to even listen? Does that number also include the women who already accept all of the Church’s teaching on contraception and have heard all they need to know? Since the age-range of women surveyed was 18-54 years of age, does state in life have anything to do with openness to learning more? Thankfully, this was just the preliminary report and I look forward to reading the full report when it is released later this year.

This study is important to the Church for what it reveals: Catholic women are not being reached effectively.  Teachers of the faith, both priests and laity must present Church teaching “frequently, positively, and without apology, from the pulpit and through Church ministries. But it also needs to be presented persuasively— something the Church has struggled to do effectively—and through new communications strategies including new media, social communications, peer ministries, and other new approaches. (20)

This study is so important for the Church. It’s important to know where the Church’s strengths as well as weaknesses are, so that the Good News may be taught even more effectively. Won’t you please share this study with your priest/bishop/apostolate coordinator? 

Next week, we will take a good look at what the researchers suggest should be the next steps, as well as highlight some useful resources for priests and laity to utilize as they spread the beautiful teachings of the Church.

—–

* “Catholic woman” is defined in this study as a church-going woman who either attends church frequently (once a week), or infrequently (less than weekly, but at least a few times a year)

Picture of Kayla Peterson

Kayla Peterson

Kayla Peterson is a Catholic, a wife, and a book addict. On June 25, 2011 she married the love of her life. Together, they are working on building their marriage for the Lord. Though she is Catholic and her husband is not, they enjoy worshiping Christ together, finding common ground, and trying not to shout about their differences. Their hope is that their children will know, love, and honor God with all their hearts, minds, and souls. Kayla blogs about interfaith marriage and other topics that strike her fancy at The Alluring World.

Leave a Replay

5 thoughts on “What the Church Needs to Know”

  1. The reason why so few women (and men) accept the Church’s teaching is that very few Catholics promote NFP as an effective method of family planning and GOOD thing that helps married couples.

    Among the 13% of women who “completely accept the Church’s teachings on contraception” are a vocal minority who go above and beyond what the Church requires. This minority is NOT faithful Catholics, but conservative heretics. We saw this crowd come out in the author’s last post as she was attacked for using NFP instead of having lots of babies right now. A big reason why Mrs. W. is not Catholic is because she felt constantly judged by this crowd (who dominated the parish playgroup) for not feeling called to have a large family and not wanting to live the “traditionalist” Catholic lifestyle. She wants nothing to do with them.

    This attitude is prevalent even among supposed “NFP promoters”. They push “openness to life” so far that they forget that couples DO have good reasons to avoid pregnancy and need a good way of doing that. We had one NFP teacher who was relatively unconcerned about our problems with using the method to avoid pregnancy, but was especially eager to help us TTC as soon as we used a fertile day. When we were (not surprisingly) not able to use THAT method effectively, we met with a really nice NFP teaching couple who gave us a presentation that contained multiple biological and theological errors. Their materials implied that NFP was bad, charting was burdensome, and it was far better to throw away your charts and have lots of babies. We left convinced that (1) NFP didn’t work and that (2) the Catholic Church wanted couples to either have lots of babies or to never have sex. It took a secular Jewish woman (and some bad experiences with contraception) to convince us that NFP really was a good thing for couples. I think these biological and theological errors in the NFP community are a big reason why clergy doesn’t want to promote NFP more.

    The belief that “NFP doesn’t work” is a BIG reason why many Catholic women reject the teaching on contraception. And some “faithful Catholics” promote this as a good thing. One Catholic blogger who was trying to be funny posted an article called “Use NFP: It doesn’t work” implying that NFP just led to lots of unplanned pregnancies, but that’s OK because children were good. Another blogger posted an article called “Bad at NFP and Proud” about how her unplanned pregnancies due to her inability to use the method properly were so wonderful because she loves her children. Oh, and did I mention that she has a health condition that makes pregnancy LIFE THREATENING? Bragging about not being able to prevent pregnancy when pregnancy is life threatening (with no explanation of why it didn’t work) is NOT a good way to promote the Church’s teaching.

    Finally, a lot of women don’t like abstinence either. The reality of NFP is that women must abstain when they are most interested in sex. Yet the idea that women like sex and don’t like abstinence isn’t really addressed. Many Catholic (and non-Catholic) women cannot comprehend how wanting sex with their husbands can be this awful, terrible sin. They really can’t understand how introducing more guilt and shame into their marriage would be beneficial. (Another reason why Mrs. W. is not Catholic.) Plus, the “all-or-nothing” attitude many Catholic NFP promoters take leads couples to believe that there is no benefit to charting unless you are going to completely follow every bit of Church teaching.

    So, in conclusion, if the Catholic Church wants to reach the “soft middle”, they need to (1) present NFP as an effective, scientific method of family planning that promotes womens’ health, (2) show that following Catholic teaching is not only workable in a marriage relationship, but beneficial; and (3) meet couples where they are and encourage them to do what they can instead of judging them for not doing what they can’t.

  2. Pingback: What the Church Needs to Know : IgnitumToday « padyvyrinube

  3. Pingback: Men and Contraception: Loving and Laying Down Our Lives : IgnitumToday

  4. Pingback: What the Church needs to Do : IgnitumToday

  5. Pingback: Trackback

Leave a Reply to waywardson Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit